Clinical Prospects of Ulinastatin in the ICU: Opportunities and Challenges—A Mini Review

Ulinastatin, a broad-spectrum serine protease inhibitor widely used in Asia, has attracted increasing interest for its potential role in critical care. This review summarizes current evidence on its efficacy and safety in acute pancreatitis, severe acute pancreatitis, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and perioperative management in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Meta-analyses suggest that ulinastatin may improve outcomes by reducing mortality, shortening intensive care unit and hospital stays, and attenuating inflammatory responses. In severe acute pancreatitis, its use has been associated with reduced mortality and shorter hospitalization. In sepsis and septic shock, ulinastatin appears to lower all-cause mortality, decrease organ dysfunction scores, and reduce inflammatory markers. Evidence in acute respiratory distress syndrome indicates improvements in the oxygenation index and possible mortality reduction. Perioperative administration during cardiac surgery may mitigate postoperative inflammation and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation. Despite these encouraging findings, most available studies originate from Asia and are limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous designs, and inconsistent dosing regimens, which restrict generalizability and prevent standardized recommendations. Additionally, although ulinastatin demonstrates a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of adverse drug reactions, long-term and multinational pharmacovigilance data remain limited. Well-designed international, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to clarify optimal dosing strategies, confirm clinical efficacy across diverse populations, and determine its independent effects compared with combination therapies. Overall, ulinastatin shows promise as a potential adjunctive therapy in critical care through modulation of inflammation and organ protection, but broader global adoption will depend on higher-quality evidence addressing current methodological gaps.