Key result
Regular sports training is linked to ~28% higher total power HRV versus a sedentary lifestyle.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare heart rate variability parameters between athletes and sedentary individuals aged 18–25 years.
Does regular structured sports training improve heart rate variability parameters compared to a sedentary lifestyle in healthy young male adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
No
Does regular structured sports training improve heart rate variability parameters compared to a sedentary lifestyle in healthy young male adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 2764.65% vs 2156.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Regular sports training in young adults is associated with significantly enhanced parasympathetic modulation and overall heart rate variability compared to a sedentary lifestyle.
Associated with better HRV in young athletes; leaves open causal effects of training, needing prospective trials.
The present study aimed to compare heart rate variability (HRV) parameters between athletes and sedentary individuals aged 18–25 years. A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted among 80 healthy young adults divided into two groups: 40 athletes engaged in regular structured sports training and 40 sedentary individuals with minimal physical activity. Five-minute electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings were obtained in the supine position under controlled laboratory conditions. Total power was significantly higher in athletes than in sedentary individuals (2764.65 [standard deviation (SD)=656.17] ms² vs. 2156.60 [SD=713.11] ms², P<0.001). High-frequency (HF) power was also significantly higher in athletes compared with sedentary individuals (1118.42 [SD=379.79] ms² vs. 726.23 [SD=609.52] ms², P<0.001). In contrast, low-frequency (LF) power did not differ significantly between the two groups (1012.34 [SD=426.18] ms² vs. 1087.85 [SD=472.85] ms², P=0.455). LF normalized unit (LFnu) was lower in athletes than in sedentary individuals, although the difference was not statistically significant (55.47 [SD=11.50] vs. 60.88 [SD=16.15], P=0.088). HF normalized unit (HFnu) was significantly higher in athletes than in sedentary individuals (51.90 [SD=13.28] vs. 39.01 [SD=16.08], P<0.001). The LF/HF ratio was significantly lower in athletes compared with sedentary individuals (1.07 [SD=0.63] vs. 1.96 [SD=1.19], P<0.001). SD of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNNs) was significantly higher in athletes than in sedentary individuals (83.30 [SD=32.00] ms vs. 54.58 [SD=35.86] ms, P<0.001). Similarly, root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD) was significantly higher in athletes compared with sedentary individuals (64.86 [SD=23.78] ms vs. 42.67 [SD=35.46] ms, P<0.001). The percentage of normal-to-normal intervals that differ by more than 50 milliseconds (pNN50) value was also significantly higher in athletes than in sedentary individuals (33.35 [SD=13.16]% vs. 13.67 [SD=16.11]%, P<0.001). HRV assessment provides a reliable non-invasive marker for evaluating cardiovascular health and training effects in young adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saini et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy young adults (n=80). Regular structured sports training vs. Sedentary lifestyle with minimal physical activity was evaluated on Total power (ms²) (p=<0.001). Athletes engaged in regular sports training exhibited significantly higher total power (2764.65 vs 2156.60 ms², P<0.001) and enhanced parasympathetic modulation compared to sedentary individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: