Key result
Cluster RCT protocol outlines a primary care quality improvement program to reduce CVD hospitalizations in CHD.
Why the study?
A large proportion of mortality occurs in people with prior CHD, requiring effective and scalable primary care strategies to reduce unplanned hospitalisations and cardiovascular events.
Does a primary care practice-level collaborative quality improvement program reduce unplanned CVD hospitalisations in patients with coronary heart disease?
RCT (n=6,050)
Single-blind (statistician blinded, practices unblinded)
1:1 cluster randomisation, stratified by rural versus urban location and size of the practice
Yes
Does a primary care practice-level collaborative quality improvement program reduce unplanned CVD hospitalisations in patients with coronary heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This protocol outlines an approach to evaluating whether data-driven quality improvement in primary care can improve secondary prevention and clinical outcomes for patients with coronary heart disease.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, is the leading cause of death and disability globally. A large proportion of mortality occurs in people with prior CHD and effective and scalable strategies are needed to prevent associated deaths and hospitalisations. The aim of this study is to determine if a practice-level collaborative quality improvement program, focused on patients with CHD, reduces the rate of unplanned CVD hospitalisations and major adverse cardiovascular events, and increases the proportion of patients achieving risk factor targets at 24 months. METHODS: Cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a primary care quality improvement program in 50 primary care practices (n~ 10,000 patients) with 24-month follow-up. Eligible practices will be randomised (1:1) to participate in either the intervention (collaborative quality improvement program) or control (standard care) regimens. Outcomes will be assessed based on randomised allocation, according to intention-to-treat. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with unplanned CVD hospitalisations at 2 years. Secondary outcomes are proportion of patients with major adverse cardiovascular events, proportion of patients who received prescriptions for guideline-recommended medicines, proportion of patients achieving national risk factor targets and proportion with a chronic disease management plan or review. Differences in the proportion of patients who are hospitalised (as well as binary secondary outcomes) will be analysed using log-binomial regression or robust Poisson regression, if necessary. DISCUSSION: Despite extensive research with surrogate outcomes, to the authors' knowledge, this is the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a data-driven collaborative quality improvement intervention on hospitalisations, CVD events and cardiovascular risk amongst patients with CHD in the primary care setting. The use of data linkage for collection of outcomes will enable evaluation of this potentially efficient strategy for improving management of risk and outcomes for people with heart disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) number ACTRN12619001790134 (dated 20th December 2019).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Redfern et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease (n=6,050). Collaborative quality improvement program vs. Standard care was evaluated on Proportion of patients with unplanned CVD hospitalisations at 2 years. This paper is a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a primary care quality improvement program for patients with coronary heart disease; no results are yet available.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: