Key result
Women with type 2 diabetes are ~8% less likely than men to achieve HbA1c targets.
Why the study?
Sex differences in cardiometabolic risk factors and their management in type 2 diabetes have not been fully identified.
Does female sex negatively impact cardiometabolic risk factor levels and target achievement in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=6,637)
Yes
Does female sex negatively impact cardiometabolic risk factor levels and target achievement in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Women with type 2 diabetes display an adverse cardiometabolic profile regarding obesity and have greater difficulty achieving HbA1c and LDL-C targets compared to men, highlighting the need for improved, possibly sex-specific, management strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sex differences in HbA1c and LDL-C target achievement may exist in type 2 diabetes; leaves open whether sex-specific strategies improve outcomes.
Introduction Sex differences in cardiometabolic risk factors and their management in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have not been fully identified. Therefore, we aimed to examine differences in cardiometabolic risk factor levels, pharmacological treatment and achievement of risk factor control between women and men with T2D. Research design and methods Cross-sectional data from the Dutch Diabetes Pearl cohort were used (n=6637, 40% women). Linear and Poisson regression analyses were used to examine sex differences in cardiometabolic risk factor levels, treatment, and control. Results Compared with men, women had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (mean difference 1.79 kg/m 2 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.08)), while no differences were found in hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Women had lower diastolic blood pressure (−1.94 mm Hg (95% CI −2.44 to −1.43)), higher total cholesterol (TC) (0.44 mmol/L (95% CI 0.38 to 0.51)), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (0.26 mmol/L (95% CI 0.22 to 0.31)), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) sex-standardized (0.02 mmol/L (95% CI 0.00 to 0.04)), and lower TC:HDL ratio (−0.29 (95% CI −0.36 to −0.23)) and triglycerides (geometric mean ratio 0.91 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.98)). Women had a 16% higher probability of being treated with antihypertensive medication in the presence of high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and elevated SBP than men (relative risk 0.84 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.98)), whereas no sex differences were found for glucose-lowering medication and lipid-modifying medication. Among those treated, women were less likely to achieve treatment targets of HbA 1c (0.92 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.98)) and LDL-c (0.89 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92)) than men, while no differences for SBP were found. Conclusions In this Dutch T2D population, women had a slightly different cardiometabolic risk profile compared with men and a substantially higher BMI. Women had a higher probability of being treated with antihypertensive medication in the presence of high CVD risk and elevated SBP than men, and were less likely than men to achieve treatment targets for HbA 1c and LDL levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jong et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 Diabetes (n=6,637). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Achievement of HbA1c treatment target (≤53 mmol/mol) among those treated (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98). Women with type 2 diabetes were less likely than men to achieve treatment targets for HbA1c and LDL-C, and had a substantially higher BMI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: