Key result
NYHA class IV before TAVR is linked to ~228% higher 1-year mortality vs class I/II.
Why the study?
The impact of pre-procedural NYHA classification on TAVR procedural success, complications, and outcomes remains underrepresented in recent studies.
Does pre-procedural NYHA class III/IV increase mortality and peri-procedural complications compared to NYHA class I/II in patients undergoing TAVR?
Cohort (n=2,161)
Yes
Does pre-procedural NYHA class III/IV increase mortality and peri-procedural complications compared to NYHA class I/II in patients undergoing TAVR?
Pre-procedural NYHA class IV is a strong, independent predictor of increased 30-day and 1-year mortality, as well as peri-procedural complications, in patients undergoing TAVR.
Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the standard treatment for aortic stenosis (AS), particularly in elderly or high-risk surgical patients. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, which assesses the severity of heart failure (HF), is a key factor influencing TAVR outcomes. However, its impact on procedural success, complications, and outcomes remains underrepresented in recent studies. Methods In this multicenter study, data from 2,256 patients who underwent TAVR between 2017 and 2022 at two high-frequency German Heart Centers were analyzed. Demographics, comorbidities, and peri-procedural parameters were evaluated to determine the influence of pre-procedural NYHA classification on complications, hospital stay, and outcomes. Results Pre-procedural NYHA III/IV were associated with higher peri-procedural complication rates, prolonged hospital stays, and increased mortality compared to NYHA I/II. Specifically, rates were higher for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (5.3% vs. 0.7%; p<0.001), acute coronary intervention (1.9% vs. 0.0%; p=0.006), vasopressor use >6h (11.7% vs. 1.6%; p<0.001), and renal replacement therapy (6.8% vs. 0.2%; p<0.001). Procedure-related complications like vascular closure device failure (4.9% vs. 1.3%; p=0.008), need for vascular surgery (9.0% vs. 6.3%; p=0.002), and blood transfusion (9.4% vs. 4.7%; p=0.017) were more common in NYHA IV. Median hospital stay was longer in NYHA IV (10.0 vs. 6.0 days; p<0.001). The 30-day mortality rate was 8.3% (NYHA IV) vs. 1.4% (NYHA I/II), and 1-year mortality was 19.2% vs. 5.2% (p<0.001). Conclusions NYHA classification is a reliable predictor of TAVR outcomes, highlighting a distinct gradation in risk and recovery profiles associated with higher NYHA classes. The findings emphasize the critical role of comprehensive pre-procedural evaluation and timely intervention. These insights could shape future guidelines on patient selection and management in TAVR, ultimately enhancing survival rates and quality of life, particularly in high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markus et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=2,161). Pre-procedural NYHA class IV vs. Pre-procedural NYHA class I/II was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.98-5.46, p=<0.001). Pre-procedural NYHA class IV was independently associated with significantly higher 1-year mortality compared to NYHA class I/II (OR 3.28) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: