Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Democratic backsliding by populist leaders impacts democracies worldwide. Existing frameworks either focus on institutional dimensions while overlooking socio-cultural transformations or capture comprehensive breadth but conceptualise backsliding as sequential steps rather than concurrent dimensions. We introduce the backsliding protocol, a seven-category framework integrating both approaches to capture how right-wing populists simultaneously erode institutional checks and reshape social-cultural norms. Drawing on an original dataset of anti-democratic legislation in Israel’s 25th Knesset (December 2022–July 2023), we demonstrate backsliding across all seven categories: judicial overhaul, electoral manipulation, civil service politicization, media control, human rights violations, religious coercion and academic freedom constraints. Comparison with the 20th Knesset reveals an eightfold increase in anti-democratic bills. Temporal analysis shows tactical flexibility: when judicial reforms met resistance, the coalition pivoted to social-cultural legislation. Extending the protocol to Hungary and India reveals systematic patterns across contexts, providing tools to identify, monitor and counter these threats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lavi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: