Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identification and/or association of unidentified γ -ray sources with lower-energy counterparts represents a key challenge in modern astronomy, due to the relatively large positional uncertainty provided by γ -ray detectors. We selected unidentified Fermi objects (UFOs) positionally compatible with hard X-ray sources in the latest Palermo Swift-BAT hard X-ray Catalog and in the SRG/ART-XC all-sky X-ray survey Catalog, to identify lower-energy sources and possibly associate them to the UFOs. We found 17 UFOs with overlapping hard X-ray sources. We then collected soft X-ray data from Swift-XRT, Chandra-ACIS, XMM-Newton-EPIC, and eROSITA, identified 16 soft X-ray counterparts to the hard X-ray sources, and associate 15 with known astronomical objects, classified as: blazars/blazar candidates (two sources), Seyfert galaxies (five sources), X-ray binaries (two sources), generic X-ray sources (one source), cataclysmic variables (CVs; two sources), and variable stars (three sources). Blazars and Seyfert galaxies are likely lower-energy counterparts to the UFOs, since their mid-IR colors and broadband spectral energy distributions suggest significant jetted, nonthermal emission. X-ray binaries can be potential lower-energy counterparts to the UFOs, since this class of sources has been already observed to emit γ -rays. The generic X-ray source has been proposed as a pulsar candidate, and we therefore suggest that it can be the lower-energy counterpart to the UFO. CVs have been suggested as potential γ -ray emitters, so, if confirmed, the two sources classified as CVs would represent the first γ -ray emitting sources of this kind. Finally, we consider the association of the three variable stars with the UFOs unlikely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paggi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: