Key result
Chinese version of the LKQCHD demonstrates excellent content validity for adolescent congenital heart disease.
Why the study?
Is the Chinese translation of the Leuven Knowledge Questionnaire for Congenital Heart Disease a valid instrument to assess disease-specific knowledge in adolescents with congenital heart disease and their parents?
Cross-Sectional (n=178)
No
Is the Chinese translation of the Leuven Knowledge Questionnaire for Congenital Heart Disease a valid instrument to assess disease-specific knowledge in adolescents with congenital heart disease and their parents?
The Chinese translation of the Leuven Knowledge Questionnaire for Congenital Heart Disease provides a valid and comprehensively tested tool for evaluating disease-specific knowledge in affected adolescents and their parents.
BACKGROUND: Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) and their parents need to have sufficient knowledge on their condition, treatment, medication, and preventive measures. The Leuven Knowledge Questionnaire for Congenital Heart Disease (LKQCHD) was developed to comprehensively measure the level of knowledge in patients with CHD. AIMS: This study aimed to translate the LKQCHD into Chinese and to test its validity to be used in patients with CHD and their parents. METHOD: Questionnaire translation was guided by a three-step linguistic validation method. Evidence based on test content and on relation with other variables was obtained. For test content, we included five experts in CHD and research methods. Furthermore, the instrument was tested in 89 pairs of adolescents with CHD and their parents. RESULTS: We found a high item-level content validity index (>0.78 in all except two items), high scale-level content validity index (>0.90), high free-marginal multirater Kappa (>0.75), and low average proportion of missing values (0.49% in adolescents; 0.51% in parents), showing an excellent content validity. The hypothesized positive correlations between parental knowledge and parental educational level and between patient's knowledge and patient's age, as well as the hypothesis that parents have more knowledge than their children, were confirmed. This provides validity evidence based on relation with other variables. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the LKQCHD is valid to assess the level of knowledge in patients with CHD and their parents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Congenital heart disease (n=178). Leuven Knowledge Questionnaire for Congenital Heart Disease (Chinese version) was evaluated on Content validity evaluated by Item-level Content Validity Index (I-CVI), Scale-level Content Validity Index (S-CVI), multirater Kappa, and proportion of missing values. The Chinese version of the Leuven Knowledge Questionnaire for Congenital Heart Disease demonstrated excellent content validity (scale-level content validity index >0.90) for assessing disease-specific knowledge in adolescents with congenital heart disease and their parents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: