Key result
The simplified Chinese version of the CADE-Q SV demonstrated good reliability (ICC > 0.70, Cronbach α > 0.70) and discriminant validity for evaluating CHD-related knowledge in Chinese immigrants.
Why the study?
Chinese immigrants in Western countries often have disease-related knowledge deficits, but no instrument was available to assess CHD-related knowledge in this population.
Cross-Sectional (n=202)
Yes
The simplified Chinese version of the CADE-Q SV is a valid and reliable tool for assessing CHD-related knowledge in Chinese immigrants.
The adapted questionnaire enables CHD knowledge assessment in Chinese immigrants; leaves open effects on adherence or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Disease-related knowledge deficits are common in Chinese immigrants living in Western countries, putting them at risk of disease progression and mortality, particularly those with a coronary heart disease (CHD) diagnosis. However, no measurement instrument is available to assess CHD-related knowledge in this population. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to culturally adapt and examine the psychometric properties of the short version of Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q SV) (simplified Chinese version) in Chinese immigrants with CHD. METHODS: Mandarin-speaking people recruited from medical centers and cardiology clinics across metropolitan Sydney completed the 20-item CADE-Q SV (5 domains; potential scores: 0-20). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach α . A subgroup (n = 40) repeated the survey 2 weeks later for test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient. Factor structure (confirmatory factor analysis) and discriminant (known-groups) validation using education and English proficiency (univariate general linear model) were also undertaken. RESULTS: Participants (n = 202) had a mean (SD) age of 66.08 (10.93) years, 45.1% were male, and the mean (SD) total CADE-Q SV score was 13.07 (4.57). Reliability and consistency were good (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.70; Cronbach α coefficients > 0.70, for total and per domain, respectively). The 5-domain structure was validated by confirmatory factor analysis. The scale demonstrated discriminant validity, with low education ( P < .001) and low English proficiency ( P = .017) associated with lower knowledge scores. CONCLUSION: The CADE-Q SV (simplified Chinese version) can be used as a valid and reliable instrument, either paper based or digital, to evaluate the CHD-related knowledge of Chinese immigrants. This scale can be adapted to other migrant populations in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=202). CADE-Q SV (simplified Chinese version) was evaluated on Psychometric properties including reliability, consistency, factor structure, and discriminant validity. The simplified Chinese version of the CADE-Q SV demonstrated good reliability (ICC > 0.70, Cronbach α > 0.70) and discriminant validity for evaluating CHD-related knowledge in Chinese immigrants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: