Key result
Highest METS-IR quartile linked to ~261% greater risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity versus the lowest.
Why the study?
Cardiometabolic multimorbidity is a global health challenge carrying high mortality risk, but the relationship between the metabolic score for insulin resistance and the incidence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity remains to be explored.
Does a higher metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) predict the incidence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity in a Chinese cohort?
Cohort (n=6,977)
Yes
Does a higher metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) predict the incidence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity in a Chinese cohort?
A higher metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) is strongly and non-linearly associated with an increased risk of developing cardiometabolic multimorbidity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher METS-IR was associated with increased CMM incidence; leaves open its incremental value for risk stratification in middle-aged adults.
Background Cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) has emerged as a global health challenge with a high mortality risk. This study aimed to explore the association between the metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and the incidence of CMM. Methods This study included 6,977 individuals in the CHARLS database. We used multiple cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) analysis to evaluate the association between METS-IR and CMM. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were also performed. Results During a median 109 (108–109) months of follow-up, 745 (10.7%) participants were diagnosed with new-onset CMM. The incidences of CMM among participants in quartiles (Q) 1–4 of METS-IR were 4.99, 7.51, 10.67, and 19.54%, respectively. METS-IR was significantly higher in individuals with CMM compared to those without CMM ( p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, a higher METS-IR was significantly associated with an increased risk of CMM. Compared to participants in Q1 of METS-IR, the hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) using cox proportional hazards regression analysis for those in Q2–4 were 1.52 (1.15–2.00), 2.02 (1.56–2.63), and 3.61 (2.80–4.64), respectively. RCS analysis revealed a significant nonlinear association between METS-IR and CMM (nonlinear p < 0.05). The association between METS-IR and the incidence of CMM was present in almost all the subgroups. Furthermore, the predictive ability of METS-IR for CMM was 0.669, which surpassed that of both the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the triglyceride glucose index. Conclusion A higher METS-IR was closely associated with an increased risk of CMM. Further studies on METS-IR could be beneficial for preventing and treating CMM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiometabolic multimorbidity (n=6,977). Metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) vs. Lowest quartile (Q1) of METS-IR was evaluated on Incidence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) (HR 3.61, 95% CI 2.80-4.64, p=<0.001). A higher metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) was significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity, with the highest quartile showing a hazard ratio of 3.61 compared to the lowest quartile.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: