Molecular dynamics simulations examine DNA binding interactions in response to cysteine-functionalized nanoparticles, suggesting implications for nanomaterial design.
Understanding how functionalized nanoparticles interact with double-stranded DNA at the interface is essential for two purposes. It helps interpret nanoparticle-induced nucleic acid deformation and guides the design of DNA-active nanomaterials. Here, we use all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, umbrella sampling, and electrostatic/contact analyses to examine the sequence and DNA-size dependence of the interactions between a cysteine-functionalized CdTe nanoparticle and dsDNA, with groove geometry serving as a key interfacial binding mode. For both 32-bp DNA sequences studied, nanoparticle binding is attractive in both groove orientations, but the major-groove pathway is consistently more favorable than the minor-groove pathway. The free-energy minimum for the GATATC-containing DNA is deeper than that for the ATCGAT mutant, especially in the major groove, indicating clear sequence dependence in groove-mediated interfacial binding. Structural analysis further shows that stronger major-groove binding is associated with more extensive nanoparticle-DNA contacts and a more favorable local electrostatic environment. Nanoparticle adsorption induces measurable DNA bending. The bending response follows the same trend as the interfacial binding strength. Specifically, major-groove binding produces stronger bending than minor-groove binding. The GATATC-containing DNA bends more strongly than the ATCGAT mutant. The bending response also weakens with increasing DNA size, as the duplex length increases from 32 bp to 80-90 bp. Analyses of base stacking and phosphodiester-bond fluctuations further indicate that local structural stability differs between A-T and G-C base pairs. These local differences contribute to the observed DNA bending. These results define the CdTe nanoparticle-DNA interaction as a sequence- and size-dependent interfacial recognition process that is mediated by groove-dependent binding, in which interfacial contacts, electrostatic interactions, sequence, and DNA length jointly govern binding free energy and DNA deformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: