Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial assesses participant diversity in clinical trials, indicating the influence of IRB type and FDA guidance.
We assessed participant representation in phase 3 clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov that were conducted in the U.S. between 2020 and 2024. From the 211 clinical trials analyzed, most relied on commercial IRBs (23.2%). Most of the trials in the “unknown” category were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies which likely relied on commercial IRBs. Trials relying on commercial and other/unknown IRBs had the least Black (10.4 −12.1%) and Asian (3.1–3.8%) participation as compared to Academic IRBs which had the highest Black (13.7%) and Asian (9.4%) enrollment (p < .01). Medical Center IRBs had the highest Hispanic enrollment (23.2%) compared to commercial (16.8%) and other IRBs (18.3%). When assessing the impact of the DAP, demographic composition was more varied after the DAP (p < .01). NIH and other sources of funding had greater overall participant representation, by ethnicity and race compared to industry funded trials (p < .01).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wheeler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: