What question did this study set out to answer?

This study investigates if risk-taking in working capital management clarifies the cash conversion cycle anomaly.

July 13, 2026Australian Journal of Management0 citations

Risk management in working capital policies and the cash conversion cycle anomaly

Key Points

This study investigates if risk-taking in working capital management clarifies the cash conversion cycle anomaly.
Analyzed a dataset of non-financial US firms from 1986 to 2022.
Examined the relationship between cash conversion cycle, operational risk, and capital expenditures.
Performed further analysis on inventory and accounts payable policies.
Firms with lower cash conversion cycle show higher operational risk.
Firms allocate more resources to capital expenditures during the cash conversion cycle anomaly.
Positive abnormal returns are linked to higher operational risk associated with low cash conversion cycle.

Abstract

This study aims to explore whether risk-taking in working capital management can explain the cash conversion cycle (CCC) anomaly documented in recent literature. By examining a dataset comprising non-financial US firms spanning from 1986 to 2022, this study finds that firms with lower CCC not only exhibit a higher level of operational risk, but they also allocate more resources towards capital expenditures during the CCC anomaly period. These findings suggest that the significantly positive abnormal returns of firms with low CCC in the CCC anomaly can be attributed to the undertaking of higher operational risk. Further analysis on the components of CCC is consistent with firms managing their inventory and accounts payable day policies to expose them to higher operational risk. JEL Classification: G10, G14

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper