Identifies diabetic kidney disease sub-phenotypes in adults, suggesting personalized intervention strategies.
This study aimed to identify clinically interpretable DKD sub-phenotypes for personalized prognosis and intervention. We enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from three hospitals in China. Clinically interpretable sub-phenotypes were identified using two complementary clustering frameworks: a static model (k-means clustering) capturing the metabolic–renal profile at DKD diagnosis, and a dynamic model (group-based multi-trajectory model, GBMTM) reconstructing longitudinal trajectories preceding diagnosis. Associations between DKD clusters and post-diagnosis DKD progression were estimated using cox regression. A total of 1520 participants were included for the analysis of static clustering, 32.53% were females with a mean age of 54.4 ± 12.1 years. The static clustering method classified DKD patients into four clusters: BALANCE, YOUTH, TYPICAL and NATURAL. Compared with the participants in YOUTH, the hazard ratios (HRs) of progressing to higher stage of CKD (G3b-G5) in BALANCE, TYPICAL and NATURAL are 1.68 (95%CI:0.81–3.49), 7.85 (95%CI:4.25–14.51), 6.58 (95%CI:3.54–12.24), respectively. GBMTM identified three longitudinal trajectories. The HRs (95%CI) of progressing to higher stage of CKD (G3b-G5) was 2.48 (95%CI:1.50–4.09) in Trajectory 1 compared with Trajectory 2. In addition, the clustering results obtained from the validation cohort were consistent with the derivation cohort. By integrating static and dynamic clustering approaches, this study identifies novel DKD sub-phenotypes, and evaluated the risk of DKD progression in each cluster.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: