Tests the consciousness-gravity hypothesis in controlled conditions, indicating theoretical implications.
The published consciousness-gravity extension of the C² = C framework proposes that consciousness andgravity are dual expressions of a shared continuity substrate: consciousness as inward continuity expression andgravity as outward continuity constraint. That proposal remains conceptual until it is connected to a bounded,measurable prediction. This paper introduces such a connection as an additional hypothesis, designated AG-1.AG-1 states that, after ordinary changes in biological mass distribution and environmental coupling areaccounted for within stated experimental uncertainty, a controlled change in coherent directed awarenessproduces a nonzero, reversible perturbation in locally measured gravity-like acceleration. A dimensionlessoperational state variable A(t) is coupled phenomenologically to a weak-field potential perturbation through afinite-range Helmholtz model with coupling strength λ C and range ℓC. Two complementary experimentalgeometries are developed: a single-source symmetric dual-sensor configuration that suppresses first-ordertranslational motion, and a paired-source antiphase configuration that reverses the predicted signal whilepreserving static source mass. The protocol specifies randomized condition assignment, independent stateverification, blinding, preregistration, synchronized monitoring of mechanical, respiratory, cardiac, thermal,acoustic, electromagnetic, and atmospheric pathways, and staged criteria for distinguishing a state-lockedanomaly from a gravitational-class interaction. A null result yields an exclusion region in (λ C, ℓC) space andconstrains AG-1 without falsifying C² = C or the broader continuity framework. A positive result would requiredistance scaling, geometry reversal, test-mass behavior, shielding tests, cross-instrument agreement, andindependent replication before it could be interpreted as evidence of a measurable awareness-gravity bridge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parnell Turner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: