Evaluates NK cell therapy effectiveness in glioblastoma, indicating potential for overcoming resistance.
Background Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Natural killer (NK) cell therapy is a promising immunotherapeutic strategy, yet its efficacy remains limited. We evaluated FT538, a clinical-grade NK product derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), in glioblastoma models. Methods FT538, engineered with a high-affinity non-cleavable CD16 Fc receptor, a membrane-bound IL-15/IL-15Rα fusion protein, and CD38 knockout, was tested against 13 patient-derived glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs) in vitro and in orthotopic xenograft models. Intracranial persistence and neurotoxicity were assessed in mice. Surface proteomics identified therapeutic targets, and a B7-H3–targeted tri-specific killer engager (TriKE) was evaluated with FT538 and NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells. Results GSCs were classified as sensitive (38%), moderately sensitive (38%), or resistant (23%) to FT538. Intracranial administration in mice was well tolerated, persisted for at least 35 days, and caused no neurotoxicity. A single intratumoral dose induced complete regression in sensitive xenografts. Surface profiling identified B7-H3 as a target to overcome resistance. Combination therapy with FT538 and a B7-H3 TriKE enhanced antitumor efficacy in resistant models, an effect also observed with adaptive NK cells. Conclusions FT538 exhibits potent tumoricidal activity in 77% of GSC lines (NK-sensitive and moderately sensitive), with curative potential in sensitive models, and demonstrates favorable persistence and tolerability in vivo. B7-H3–targeted TriKE restores NK sensitivity in resistant tumors. These findings provide a strong preclinical rationale for further clinical evaluation of FT538, alone or combined with B7-H3–targeted TriKE, for glioblastoma and other solid tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ning et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: