Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates PFOS and PFOA exposure impact on lung inflammation in mice, indicating immune regulation changes.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of co-exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) on the IL-17-related immune responses and the Poly(I:C)-induced lung inflammation. A total of 66 adult male BALB/c mice were divided into 11 groups, including controls, dose groups receiving PFOS+PFOA (1, 3, 9 mg/kg/day), and combination groups challenged with intratracheal Poly(I:C). Immunological responses were evaluated using flow cytometry, RT-qPCR and ELISA assays. Poly(I:C) stimulation increased Th1, Th17 and Th22 cell percentages, consistent with immune activation. PFOS+PFOA exposure attenuated these responses in a dose-dependent manner under Poly(I:C) (+) conditions. Conversely, increased Th2 cell percentages were observed in PFOS+PFOA exposure groups. Gene expression analyses of Stat3, Il17ra and Ror-γt further suggested tissue-level modulation of IL-17-related signalling pathways. Overall, PFOS+PFOA exposure may modulate the pulmonary immune microenvironment and alter Th1/Th17/Th22-associated responses to Poly(I:C)-induced inflammatory stimulation. These findings suggest that PFAS mixtures may influence pulmonary immune regulation under inflammatory conditions and support the inclusion of immune endpoints in PFAS toxicological evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
İNKAYA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: