Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Response reports on the importance of 1024-matrix size for improving artery visibility in cerebral imaging, suggesting focused strategies for clinical practice.
This response addresses a Letter to the Editor commenting on our article on 1024-matrix reconstruction for perforating artery visualisation in cerebral CTA using a 64-slice CT scanner (https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70055). It acknowledges that integration with iterative or deep-learning reconstruction, workflow and PACS burden, and downstream clinical outcomes warrant further study, and emphasises that a targeted 1024-matrix strategy limited to clinically critical intracranial regions offers a practical compromise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagumo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: