Essay demonstrates a new view on biological continuity and creation in relation to classical anthropology, suggesting new understandings of origins.
This essay argues that the classic chicken-and-egg paradox dissolves not only from the perspective of divine eternity but also from the internal structure of becoming itself. By distinguishing Traversal—the continuous modification of an already-existing subject—from immediate creation, it proposes that no ontological boundary exists within biological continuity at which a first chicken could emerge. The same framework then explains why this reasoning does not eliminate the first man. Adam's soul is not the terminus of a Traversal but the immediate reception of being, while simultaneously inheriting an already-condensed creation. The distinction between self-inheritance and cosmic inheritance unifies biological continuity, creation ex nihilo, and classical Christian anthropology within a single metaphysical account of origin, continuity, and the conditions under which genuine beginnings become possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oscar Gaitan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: