Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative survey analyzes how employee resistance moderates customer focus impacting productivity post-LIMS implementation.
HRMARS - This study examines employee resistance as a boundary condition shaping the effectiveness of customer focus on firm productivity after Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) implementation in Sharjah Forensic Laboratory, UAE. Grounded in the Resource-Based View, customer focus is treated as an organizational quality resource that can improve productivity when service-user needs, feedback, and responsiveness are translated into daily laboratory practices. Employee resistance is examined as a behavioral condition that may alter the extent to which this customer-oriented capability becomes productive in a post-LIMS environment. A quantitative survey design was used with 121 usable responses from laboratory employees, and the data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The selected constructs demonstrated strong reliability and validity: customer focus (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.927, composite reliability = 0.929, AVE = 0.734), employee resistance (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.916, composite reliability = 0.916, AVE = 0.707), and firm productivity (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.881, composite reliability = 0.885, AVE = 0.738). The results show that customer focus was positively and significantly related to firm productivity (beta = 0.421, t = 2.985, p = 0.001). More importantly, employee resistance significantly moderated this relationship (beta = 0.384, t = 2.415, p = 0.001), indicating that the productivity value of customer focus depends on employees’ acceptance of post-LIMS quality and service practices. The study contributes by showing that customer focus is not merely a service principle but a productivity resource whose effectiveness is behaviorally contingent in technology-enabled forensic laboratory settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alkhayyal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: