Evaluates mycosis fungoides-derived exosomes promoting cell migration, suggesting potential biomarkers for disease burden.
BACKGROUND: Literature regarding exosomes as mediators in intercellular communication to promote progression in mycosis fungoides (MF) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To characterize MF-derived exosomes and their involvement in the disease. METHODS: Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifugation from cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) cell lines, and from plasma of patients with MF and controls (healthy individuals). Exosomes were confirmed by electron microscopy, NanoSight and CD81 staining. Cell-line exosomes were profiled for microRNA array. Exosomal microRNA (exomiRNA) expression and uptake, and plasma-cell-free microRNA (cfmiRNA) were analysed by reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Exosome uptake was monitored by fluorescent labelling and CD81 immunostaining. Migration was analysed by transwell migration assay. RESULTS: MyLa- and MJ-derived exosomes had a distinctive microRNA signature with abundant microRNA (miR)-155 and miR-1246. Both microRNAs were delivered into target cells, but only exomiR-155 was tested, demonstrating a migratory effect on target cells. Plasma levels of cfmiR-1246 were significantly highest in combined plaque/tumour MF, followed by patch MF, and were lowest in controls (plaque/tumour > patch > healthy), while cfmiR-155 was upregulated only in plaque/tumour MF vs. controls. Specifically, exomiR-1246 (and not exomiR-155) was higher in plasma of plaque/tumour MF than in healthy controls. Plasma exosomes from MF but not from controls increased cell migration. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that MF-derived exosomes promote cell motility and are enriched with miR-155, a well-known microRNA in MF, and miR-1246, not previously reported in MF. Based on their plasma expression we suggest that they may serve as potential biomarkers for tumour burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moyal et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: