Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper reviews selected key perspectives on the concept of ‘power’ from the 1950 s to the present, highlighting overlooked aspects in critical interpretations that have impacted on the term’s reduction and banalization in academic discussions. Building on this review, and drawing on more recent texts, it advocates for a definition that highlights power’s heuristic utility in anthropological research, presenting power as contextual, dynamic, multilayered and contradictory forces shaping actions that offer insights into how individuals/networks navigate and re-contextualize constraints, limitations and uncertainties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victoria et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: