Key result
Rhinovirus C was significantly more likely to be isolated from children aged < 2 years compared with Rhinovirus A, though no significant differences in recorded symptoms were observed.
Why the study?
Recent studies showed RV-A and RV-C species are associated with increased disease severity, prompting this study to integrate genetic and epidemiological data using Bayesian phylogenetic methods to better understand associations between RV species and clinical features in children.
Observational (n=52)
RV-C is more frequently isolated in children under 2 years old compared to RV-A, with phylogenetic associations suggesting age-specific variations in infectivity.
RV-C linked to younger age without symptom differences; hypothesis-generating for age-specific infectivity, needs prospective validation before clinical relevance.
OBJECTIVES: Rhinoviruses (RV) represent the most common aetiological agent of all acute respiratory tract infections across all age groups and a significant burden of disease among children. Recent studies have shown that RV-A and RV-C species are associated with increased disease severity. In order to better understand the potential associations between RV species and clinical features among paediatric cases, this study aimed to integrate genetic and epidemiological data using Bayesian phylogenetic methods. METHODS: Potential associations between RV species and subtypes, and clinical disease severity using a matched dataset of 52 RV isolates sampled from children (< 18 years) in Sydney, Australia, between 2006 and 2009 were uncovered using epidemiological and phylogenetic methods. RESULTS: It was found that RV-C was significantly more likely to be isolated from paediatric cases aged < 2 years compared with RV-A, although no significant differences in recorded symptoms were observed. Significant phylogenetic-trait associations between age and the VP4/VP2 capsid protein phylogeny suggest that age-specific variations in infectivity among subtypes may may be possible. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the growing body of epidemiological evidence concerning RV. Improving surveillance and testing for RV, including routine whole genome sequencing, may improve understanding of the varied disease outcomes of RV species and subtypes. Future studies could aim to identify specific genetic markers associated with age-specific infectivity of RV, which could inform treatment practices and public health surveillance of RV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Rhinovirus infection (n=52). Rhinovirus C (RV-C) vs. Rhinovirus A (RV-A) was evaluated on Isolation from children aged < 2 years and clinical disease severity. Rhinovirus C was significantly more likely to be isolated from children aged < 2 years compared with Rhinovirus A, though no significant differences in recorded symptoms were observed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: