Key result
Fresh and frozen urine NT-proBNP diagnosed heart failure with AUCs of 0.73 and 0.65, respectively, compared to an AUC of 0.94 for plasma NT-proBNP.
Why the study?
Does urinary NT-proBNP provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to plasma NT-proBNP for detecting heart failure?
Case-Control (n=127)
Does urinary NT-proBNP provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to plasma NT-proBNP for detecting heart failure?
p-value: p=<0.001
While plasma NT-proBNP remains the most accurate diagnostic marker for heart failure, fresh urine NT-proBNP demonstrates acceptable diagnostic accuracy and may serve as a simple surrogate test.
Urine NT-proBNP shows lower diagnostic accuracy than plasma for HF; leaves open its potential as a non-invasive surrogate pending prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: The plasma N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level is an important diagnostic and prognostic marker of heart failure. Recent studies have suggested urinary NT-proBNP as a new and simple test for diagnosis of heart failure. We aim to compare diagnostic value of plasma, fresh and frozen urine levels of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for detecting heart failure. METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2012, we measured urine and plasma levels of NTproBNP in 98 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and 29 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between plasma NT-proBNP and fresh (r=0.45, p<0.001) and frozen (r=0.42, p<0.001) urine NT-proBNP concentrations in CHF patients. Due to receiver operating curve analysis, fresh and frozen urine NT-proBNP could diagnose HF with are aunder curve (AUC) of 0.73±0.04 (p<0.001) and 0.65±0.05 (p=0.01) with sensitivity and specificity of 73.97%, 58.62%, and 65.31%, 62.07%, for a cut-off of 94.2 and 96 pg/mL, respectively. Plasma NT-proBNP had greater AUC (0.94±0.02, p<0.001) and better sensitivity and specificity (94.9%, 89.66% for cut-off of 414.5 pg/mL). There was no significant correlation between LVEF and plasma, fresh and frozen urine NT-proBNP levels in CHF patients. CONCLUSION: Plasma NT-proBNP is still the best diagnostic marker with high sensitivity and specificity; however, urinary especially fresh urine NT-proBNP may be a surrogate to plasma NTproBNP for diagnosing HF with acceptable accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toufan et al. (2014) conducted a case-control in Chronic heart failure (n=127). Fresh and frozen urine NT-proBNP vs. Plasma NT-proBNP was evaluated on Diagnosis of heart failure (p=<0.001). Fresh and frozen urine NT-proBNP diagnosed heart failure with AUCs of 0.73 and 0.65, respectively, compared to an AUC of 0.94 for plasma NT-proBNP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: