Key result
Self-reported physical activity overestimates daily MVPA by ~108 minutes compared with accelerometry in CAD.
Why the study?
Self-reported physical activity often overestimates activity and underestimates sedentary behavior, creating a need to compare self-reported and objectively measured activity in CAD patients prior to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.
Does self-reported physical activity accurately estimate objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in patients with stable coronary artery disease entering cardiac rehabilitation?
Cross-Sectional (n=91)
No
Does self-reported physical activity accurately estimate objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in patients with stable coronary artery disease entering cardiac rehabilitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Self-reported physical activity questionnaires provide highly inaccurate estimates in patients with CAD, overestimating exercise and underestimating sedentary time, emphasizing the need for objective accelerometer monitoring.
Physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) levels in healthy adults are predominately based on self-reporting measures, which generally overestimate PA but underestimate SB. Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) eligible for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) follow an individualized program; thus, objective assessment of physical performance and regular daily activity is required. This study aimed to compare self-reported and objectively measured PA and SB in patients with CAD prior to out-patient CR. We included 91 patients with CAD and assessed their PA with an accelerometer for 8 days prior to CR, along with the short form of the international physical activity questionnaire. We found that most patients were sedentary (61%, ~8 h/day), and on average performed 63 min/day of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA). Males performed less daily light-intensity physical activity (−5%, p = 0.011) and performed more MVPA (+2%, p = 0.002) compared to females. Maximal aerobic capacity was significantly associated with MVPA (Spearman rho = 0.483, p < 0.001) and MVPA > 10 min bouts (Spearman rho = 0.391, p < 0.001). Self-reported measures overestimated MVPA (total MVPA, +108 min/day, p < 0.001; MVPA > 10 min bouts, +152 min, p < 0.001) and underestimated SB (−174 min/day, p < 0.001) compared to objective measures. There was no significant correlation between methods in MVPA (Spearman rho = 0.147, p = 0.165)), MVPA > 10 min bouts (Spearman rho = −0.059, p = 576), and SB (Spearman rho = 0.139, p = 0.187). Quantitative analysis demonstrated the huge proportional bias for MVPA, MVPA > 10 min bouts, and SB. Our findings demonstrate that self-reported physical activity provides inaccurate estimates of MVPA and SB in patients with CAD entering the ambulatory CR. This strongly supports the more objective assessments of daily PA, preferably using an accelerometer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kambič et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable coronary artery disease (n=91). Self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) vs. Objectively measured physical activity (ActiGraph accelerometer) was evaluated on Difference in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) between self-reported and objective measures (Mean difference +108 min/day, 95% CI 39-187, p=<0.001). Self-reported physical activity significantly overestimated moderate-to-vigorous physical activity by 108 min/day compared to objective accelerometer measurements in patients with coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: