Cross-sectional study evaluates IL-18BPa and IL-37 in COVID-19 severity, suggesting clinical relevance for risk stratification.
COVID-19 severity is largely determined by dysregulated host inflammatory responses, yet biomarkers that reflect this immunological imbalance and support clinical risk stratification remain insufficiently defined. The IL-1 cytokine family has emerged as a relevant component of antiviral and hyperinflammatory responses, particularly through the IL-18/IL-37/IL-18 binding protein a (IL-18BPa) axis, which integrates pro-inflammatory signaling and immune regulation. However, the clinical relevance of this axis in COVID-19 severity remains poorly characterized. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated IL-37, total IL-18, free IL-18, and IL-18BPa in patients with mild COVID-19, severe ICU-admitted COVID-19, and healthy controls from Northeastern Brazil. Cytokines were quantified by ELISA, free IL-18 was estimated using the law of mass action, and biochemical markers were assessed. Statistical analyses included group comparisons, correlation analyses, and ROC curve evaluation. COVID-19 patients showed reduced IL-37 levels compared with healthy controls, while severe cases presented higher IL-37 concentrations than mild cases, suggesting a compensatory but insufficient regulatory response during disease progression. Conversely, total IL-18, free IL-18, and IL-18BPa were markedly increased in severe COVID-19. In severe patients, total and free IL-18 positively correlated with triglycerides, AST, ALT, and cholesterol, linking IL-18 bioactivity to metabolic and hepatic alterations associated with systemic inflammation. ROC analysis identified IL-18BPa as the strongest discriminator of severe disease (AUC = 0.9987; sensitivity 100%; specificity 96.97%), followed by total and free IL-18 (AUC > 0.94). These findings highlight IL-18BPa as a promising biomarker of COVID-19 severity and support the clinical relevance of this regulatory axis in hyperinflammatory disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leão et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: