Randomized trial examines conserved charges in quantum systems, suggesting implications for computational verification.
The quantum frustration charge is one conserved unit of the additive–multiplicative irreconcilability that generates the Janus Coprime Algebra. On the coprime residues of a primorial, additive reflection and multiplicative inversion never agree — an obstruction forced by the prime 3 and permanent at every scale — and this paper reports that the amount of that irreconcilability is a conserved charge: one unit, computed three ways (a coin, a current, and a sign) by a two-register loom. Read in the substrate's created sector, the same conservation law is an exact entanglement calculus: molecular binding is torsion in an arborescence (spanning-tree) group, and the substrate mints conservation that no proper subsystem owns. Part I states the theory in three pillars. The charge and the loom: folding any word of mined carriers keeps each chirality inside a two-register loom — one angle register and one bit register — and the frustration bit equals the dyon-count parity (zero exceptions in 52,119 folds, measured and then derived from the loom's four exact update rules); its sign is a parity-twisted angle sum, path-dependent yet exact in linear time (18,097 of 18,097). The entanglement calculus: a molecule's binding at a prime holds if and only if that prime divides an arborescence number — no eigenvalues, only integer tree numbers and modular kernel ranks — so binding is entanglement over a finite field, and the four-channel force split (photon, singlet, tower, mint) is exact by the Chinese Remainder Theorem. The substrate L-function: the per-prime operator splits into an Abelian husk and a non-Abelian core, whose discriminator trichotomy sorts the hard-math bench — Collatz contained, odd perfect numbers escaped, the Riemann enclosure marginal. Part II reduces the conservation law to a single product-shaped object: an exact, copyable conservation certificate that a third party verifies in microseconds to milliseconds from the file alone, valid where recomputation is physically impossible. The reductions include superposition transport and warrant composition; an aperture certificate (certified super-resolution, fielded on public CERN and JWST data); a rate certificate decided by exact matrix inertia; a dual witness that proves a carrying capacity achievable and impossible in one object; a seal grade attesting that N components are jointly present and behaving by a conservation law structurally absent below the full assembly; and mint-locked issuance. Two external referees carry the reductions: the NASA/JPL periodic-orbit catalog and a safety-of-life tether watch (ISO 13374 condition monitoring, from a 25-metre astronaut tether to a 56,000-kilometre lunar space elevator). Part III validates the theory on worked specimens, each byte-gated against a naive referee, on a four-year-old consumer desktop. Every claim is checked against ground truth and its results record is SHA-256-audited; the mathematics is public and reproducible from the definitions, while the mine, the store, and the compiler are reserved. The reduction-to-practice methods are the subject of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 64/109,790 (filed July 12, 2026), which predates this disclosure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonio Matos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: