Randomized trial demonstrates enhanced performance in antenna design and optimization for MIMO applications, highlighting simulation efficiency.
This paper presents a physics-informed Gaussian process regression (PI-GPR) data augmentation framework, combined with standalone machine-learning predictive models, for the design, optimization, and performance prediction of a flower-shaped wideband millimeter-wave antenna and its extension to a compact multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) configuration. The framework expands an initial CST-simulated dataset to 2,014 physics-consistent samples by integrating closed-form analytical modeling, electromagnetic constraints, and data-driven GPR, eliminating the need for exhaustive full-wave simulations. Following the data augmentation, five predictive modeling techniques including response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural network (ANN), ridge regression (RR), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting (GB) are developed and cross-validated, where the RF model achieved improved performance of \(R^2 = 0.999\) , RMSE \(= 0.031\) and 0.028, and MSE \(= 0.001\) and 0.001 for resonant frequency ( \(F_r\) ) and impedance bandwidth (BW), respectively. The optimized single-element antenna, designed on a Rogers RT/5880 substrate with overall dimensions of \(0.7λ _0 × 0.7λ _0 × 0.069λ _0~mm^3\) , achieves a gain of 3.0 dBi at 28 GHz and an impedance bandwidth spanning 22–41.378 GHz. This element antenna is subsequently transformed into a compact quad-port \(2{× }2\) MIMO antenna with overall dimensions of \(1.563λ _0 × 1.563λ _0 × 0.069λ _0\) mm \(^3\) , yielding a bandwidth of 19.833 GHz, a peak element gain of 6.22 dBi, an envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) below 0.0035, and a diversity gain (DG) exceeding 9.983 dB. All results are validated by independent CST and HFSS electromagnetic simulations, which show close agreement. The proposed methodology demonstrates a scalable and simulation-efficient approach to mmWave MIMO antenna design for interference-prone, multi-sensor Internet of Things (IoT) applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayalew et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: