Randomized trial demonstrates improved modeling efficiency in bridge engineering, suggesting enhanced automation capabilities.
Building Information Modeling (BIM) has been increasingly adopted in bridge engineering, yet the modeling of trestle bridges still involves repetitive manual parameter entry, component-family selection, coordinate calculation, API scripting, clash checking, and iterative correction in conventional BIM software. To address these interaction-intensive and weakly automated workflows, this paper proposes a large language model (LLM)-driven multi-agent framework for automatic trestle-bridge modeling. The framework is organized into a platform-independent reasoning layer and a Revit-specific execution layer. In the reasoning layer, the Requirement Analyst agent parses natural-language commands, validates modular design constraints, and completes missing parameters, while the Architect agent interprets external engineering parameter files, constructs geometric baselines, and generates a structured component layout scheme. In the execution layer, the Programmer agent maps the layout scheme into Revit API function calls, and the Revit plug-in executes the generated function list within the BIM environment. The proposed system can transform heterogeneous design inputs into traceable, constraint-aware, and executable modeling instructions, and the execution layer supports closed-loop diagnosis and local correction of modeling failures, completing an end-to-end process from design intent to 3D BIM model. Experiments on trestle-bridge modeling scenarios show that the proposed framework improves modeling robustness, reduces manual intervention, and provides a feasible path for automated bridge-engineering design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: