Key result
Severe mitral regurgitation was associated with significantly greater histologically quantified left atrial fibrosis (29.69% vs. 12.17%, p<0.0001) compared to a CABG surgical comparator group.
Why the study?
The relationship between tissue inflammatory and profibrotic signaling, histologically quantified fibrosis, and echocardiographic remodeling in severe mitral regurgitation remains incompletely characterized.
Does severe mitral regurgitation increase biatrial inflammatory and profibrotic remodeling compared to isolated CABG in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery?
Cross-Sectional (n=36)
No
Does severe mitral regurgitation increase biatrial inflammatory and profibrotic remodeling compared to isolated CABG in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery?
Severe mitral regurgitation is associated with significant biatrial structural remodeling and fibrosis compared to non-valvular cardiac disease, supporting the concept of an MR-induced atrial cardiomyopathy.
Background/Objectives: Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with chronic atrial stretch, chamber enlargement, pulmonary pressure elevation, and atrial fibrosis, yet the relationship between tissue inflammatory/profibrotic signaling, histologically quantified fibrosis, and echocardiographic remodeling remains incompletely characterized. This study aimed to compare biatrial tissue remodeling in patients with severe MR undergoing mitral valve surgery with a practical non-valvular surgical comparator group undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: This single-center, observational, cross-sectional comparative study included 36 elective cardiac-surgery patients: 22 with severe MR and 14 undergoing isolated CABG without significant valvular disease. Left- and right-atrial tissue samples were collected intraoperatively. IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β expression was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR using pooled atrial samples stratified by atrial side and study group, whereas atrial fibrosis was quantified histologically on individual tissue specimens using Masson’s trichrome staining and digital image analysis. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters were compared between groups, and exploratory associations were assessed with cautious interpretation. Results: Compared with the CABG comparator group, patients with severe MR showed a pooled molecular profile compatible with higher aggregate atrial expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β; because qPCR was performed on pooled tissue preparations, these molecular findings were interpreted descriptively and were not used for patient-level inferential statistics. Histologically quantified fibrosis was significantly increased in severe MR in both the left atrium (29.69 ± 12.26% vs. 12.17 ± 4.56%, p < 0.0001) and the right atrium (25.25 ± 11.33% vs. 9.01 ± 4.46%, p < 0.0001). The MR group also showed more pronounced echocardiographic remodeling, including larger estimated left atrial volume, higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and greater right ventricular diameter. Exploratory individual-level analyses were restricted to histological fibrosis and echocardiographic variables. Conclusions: Severe MR was associated with marked echocardiographic remodeling and significantly greater histologically quantified biatrial fibrosis compared with a CABG surgical comparator group. Pooled qPCR findings support an aggregate inflammatory/profibrotic signal, but they should be interpreted descriptively because individual-level molecular variability could not be assessed. These findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish causality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merce et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Severe mitral regurgitation (n=36). Severe mitral regurgitation vs. Isolated CABG without significant valvular disease was evaluated on Histologically quantified left atrial fibrosis (p=<0.0001). Severe mitral regurgitation was associated with significantly greater histologically quantified left atrial fibrosis (29.69% vs. 12.17%, p<0.0001) compared to a CABG surgical comparator group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: