Key result
Calcium blockers reduce protein leakage ~22% during 37°C calcium paradox injury but fail below 25°C.
Why the study?
The study investigated the interrelationship between temperature and the ability of calcium antagonists to reduce protein leakage in the calcium paradox.
Do calcium antagonists reduce protein leakage in the calcium paradox at different temperatures in isolated perfused rat hearts?
Do calcium antagonists reduce protein leakage in the calcium paradox at different temperatures in isolated perfused rat hearts?
The efficacy of calcium antagonists in reducing protein leakage during the calcium paradox is highly temperature-dependent, with an abrupt loss of effect below 25°C.
Efficacy loss below 25°C cautions against calcium blockers in hypothermic models; leaves open channel target temperature sensitivity.
The isolated perfused rat heart preparation was used to investigate the interrelationship between temperature and the ability of calcium antagonists to reduce protein leakage in the calcium paradox. Exploiting the fact that although the calcium depletion phase of calcium paradox-injury is highly temperature sensitive, the calcium repletion phase, during which time the injury is manifested, is temperature independent. Verapamil (4 μmol l−1) included in a 10 min period of calcium depletion (37ΰC) and a 20 min period of calcium repletion (37δC) was known to reduce cumulative protein leakage by 22±3%. With calcium depletion again at 37δC but repletion at 21δC verapamil failed to achieve any reduction in protein leakage despite the fact that leakage in the 21δC control group did not differ signficantly from that in the 37δC control group. Temperature-response studies (repletion temperature of 4, 10, 21. 23, 25, 28. 31. 34 and 37δC) revealed an abrupt loss of drug effect below 25δC. Studies with D600 (10 μmol l−1 nifedipine (4 μmol l−1) terodiline (4 μmol l−1) fendiline (20 μmol l−1) and diltiazem (2 μmol l−1) revealed that while all of these drugs reduced protein leakage at 37δC(24±3%, 31±2%, 31±3%, 23±3% and 29±3%. respectively), like verapamil they had no effect at 21δC. Additional studies showed that the loss of efficacy could not be attributed to either a temperature-induced change in protein leakage kinetics or drug dose-response characteristics. The similarity of results between this highly diverse group of drugs would suggest that the temperature effect is more likely to be operative upon the target rather than the drug and might possibly be attributable to some nonspecific membrane-lipoprotein phase transition or to some temperature-induced change in the conformation of the slow calcium channel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (1983) studied Calcium paradox-injury. Slow channel calcium blockers (verapamil, D600, nifedipine, terodiline, fendiline, diltiazem) vs. Control group was evaluated on Cumulative protein leakage. Slow channel calcium blockers reduced protein leakage during calcium paradox-injury at 37°C (e.g., verapamil by 22±3%) but abruptly lost efficacy at repletion temperatures below 25°C.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: