Key result
Simulated out-of-distribution variations degraded AI model performance for LVEF prediction, increasing the mean absolute error from 7.3% on optimal views to 10.9% with rotation and 14.7% with translation.
Why the study?
Because AI algorithms are mostly trained on 2D images, the impact of real-world human sonographer variation and out-of-distribution data on AI model performance remains difficult to determine.
Does simulated out-of-distribution spatial variation (rotation, translation, foreshortening) reduce AI model accuracy for LVEF prediction in echocardiograms compared to ideal standard views?
Does simulated out-of-distribution spatial variation (rotation, translation, foreshortening) reduce AI model accuracy for LVEF prediction in echocardiograms compared to ideal standard views?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulated spatial variations in echocardiogram image acquisition significantly degrade AI model performance, highlighting the vulnerability of 2D-trained algorithms to real-world out-of-distribution data.
Advancements in medical imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized the field of cardiac diagnostics, providing accurate and efficient tools for assessing cardiac function. AI diagnostics claims to improve upon the human-to-human variation that is known to be significant. However, when put in practice, for cardiac ultrasound, AI models are being run on images acquired by human sonographers whose quality and consistency may vary. With more variation than other medical imaging modalities, variation in image acquisition may lead to out-of-distribution (OOD) data and unpredictable performance of the AI tools. Recent advances in ultrasound technology has allowed the acquisition of both 3D as well as 2D data, however 3D has more limited temporal and spatial resolution and is still not routinely acquired. Because the training datasets used when developing AI algorithms are mostly developed using 2D images, it is difficult to determine the impact of human variation on the performance of AI tools in the real world. The objective of this project is to leverage 3D echos to simulate realistic human variation of image acquisition and better understand the OOD performance of a previously validated AI model. In doing so, we develop tools for interpreting 3D echo data and quantifiably recreating common variation in image acquisition between sonographers. We also developed a technique for finding good standard 2D views in 3D echo volumes. We found the performance of the AI model we evaluated to be as expected when the view is good, but variations in acquisition position degraded AI model performance. Performance on far from ideal views was poor, but still better than random, suggesting that there is some information being used that permeates the whole volume, not just a quality view. Additionally, we found that variations in foreshortening didn't result in the same errors that a human would make.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duffy et al. (2023) studied Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) AI prediction evaluation (n=1,528). Simulated 3D spatial transformations (rotation, translation, foreshortening) vs. Optimal standard 2D views (A4C) was evaluated on Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) prediction. Simulated out-of-distribution variations degraded AI model performance for LVEF prediction, increasing the mean absolute error from 7.3% on optimal views to 10.9% with rotation and 14.7% with translation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: