Key result
Pediatric transplant listing for malignant arrhythmia yields comparable outcomes to non-malignant cases.
Why the study?
Do pediatric patients listed for heart transplantation for malignant arrhythmias have comparable outcomes to those listed for other indications?
Cohort (n=4,630)
Yes
Do pediatric patients listed for heart transplantation for malignant arrhythmias have comparable outcomes to those listed for other indications?
Pediatric patients listed for heart transplantation due to malignant arrhythmias have comparable waitlist and post-transplant outcomes to those listed for other indications, despite presenting more frequently with cardiac arrest.
Supports similar listing for pediatric malignant arrhythmia without excess risk; leaves open prospective validation in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmias can lead to cardiac arrest and heart failure. When intractable, heart transplantation (HTX) can become the only viable treatment. This rare high-risk cohort has not been reported as a distinct group. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the outcomes of pediatric patients listed for HTX with the primary indication being malignant arrhythmia (MA). METHODS: Using the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society prospective registry, we identified all patients younger than 18 years listed between 2014 and 2022. MA as the listing indication was categorized into primary tachyarrhythmia (PT), inherited arrhythmia (IA), congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy (CM) with secondary arrhythmia. Demographic, listing, and transplant data were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 4630 patients listed and 3317 transplanted, MA was the indication in 63 (1.4%) and 49 (1.5%), respectively. Patients with MA were categorized as PT in 11 (17%), IA in 4 (6%), congenital heart disease in 6 (10%), and CM in 42 (67%). Compared with the non-MA cohort, patients listed for MA were older (mean age 10.6 ± 6.2 years vs 6.1 ± 6.2 years; P < .01), more likely to present with cardiac arrest (43% vs 11%; P < .01), and less likely to be in the intensive care unit (40% vs 58%; P < .01) or on inotropes (30% vs 60%; P < .01) at the time of listing. Outcomes including waitlist mortality, transplantation, posttransplant survival, and freedom from rejection were comparable to those of the non-MA cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients with MA constitute a small proportion of those listed for HTX in childhood. CM was the most common category, while IA and PT were rare. Their waitlist mortality and posttransplant outcomes were comparable to those of the non-MA cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atallah et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Malignant arrhythmias requiring heart transplantation (n=4,630). Malignant arrhythmia vs. Non-malignant arrhythmia was evaluated on Waitlist mortality, transplantation, posttransplant survival, and freedom from rejection. Pediatric patients listed for heart transplantation due to malignant arrhythmia had comparable waitlist mortality and posttransplant outcomes to those without malignant arrhythmia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: