Key result
The genetically modified FMDV vaccine completely protected swine against challenge with viruses of three topotypes, improving protective efficacy against the CHY topotype variant compared to the wild O/HN/CHA/93 vaccine.
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 75%
Genetically modified FMD vaccine improves cross-protection against CHY topotype in swine; leaves open need for field trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is the most economically important and highly contagious disease of cloven-hoofed animals worldwide. Control of the disease has been mainly based on large-scale vaccinations with whole-virus inactivated vaccines. In recent years, a series of outbreaks of type O FMD occurred in China (including Chinese Taipei, Chinese Hong Kong) posed a tremendous threat to Chinese animal husbandry. Its causative agent, type O FMDV, has evolved into three topotypes (East-South Asia (ME-SA), Southeast Asia (SEA), Cathay (CHY)) in these regions, which represents an important obstacle to disease control. The available FMD vaccine in China shows generally good protection against ME-SA and SEA topotype viruses infection, but affords insufficient protection against some variants of the CHY topotype. Therefore, the choice of a new vaccine strain is of fundamental importance. RESULTS: The present study describes the generation of a full-length infectious cDNA clone of FMDV vaccine strain and a genetically modified virus with some amino acid substitutions in antigenic sites 1, 3, and 4, based on the established infectious clone. The recombinant viruses had similar growth properties to the wild O/HN/CHA/93 virus. All swine immunized with inactivated vaccine prepared from the O/HN/CHA/93 were fully protected from challenge with the viruses of ME-SA and SEA topotypes and partially protected against challenge with the virus of CHY topotype at 28 days post-immunization. In contrast, the swine inoculated with the genetically modified vaccine were completely protected from the infection of viruses of the three topotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Some amino acid substitutions in the FMDV vaccine strain genome did not have an effect on the ability of viral replication in vitro. The vaccine prepared from genetically modified FMDV by reverse genetics significantly improved the protective efficacy to the variant of the CHY topotype, compared with the wild O/HN/CHA/93 virus. Thus, the full-length cDNA clone of FMDV can be a useful tool to develop genetically engineered FMDV vaccine candidates to help control porcinophilic FMD epidemics in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2012) studied Foot-and-mouth disease (n=110). Genetically modified FMDV vaccine (rM-HN) vs. Wild O/HN/CHA/93 vaccine and unvaccinated control was evaluated on Protection from clinical disease and viral infection after challenge with FMDV O/TAW/TL/97 (CHY topotype). The genetically modified FMDV vaccine completely protected swine against challenge with viruses of three topotypes, improving protective efficacy against the CHY topotype variant compared to the wild O/HN/CHA/93 vaccine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: