Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Plant-pathogenic bacteria threaten crop productivity and quality, yet chemical options remain limited compared with those for fungal and oomycete diseases. Current management relies mainly on copper bactericides, limited antibiotics, induced-resistance agents, biocontrol and resistant cultivars. However, copper and streptomycin resistance, efflux-mediated multidrug tolerance and rapid pathogen adaptation have weakened these strategies. Target-oriented research provides a framework for exploring agricultural antibacterials, anti-virulence agents, anti-colonization strategies, resistance sensitizers and host-resistance interventions, but many of these approaches remain conceptual, model-system, greenhouse or medical-bacteriology-derived rather than proven field solutions. This review classifies bacterial control targets into two interconnected groups: growth-essential targets, including peptidoglycan biosynthesis, membrane/envelope systems, nucleic-acid processes, protein synthesis, metabolism, nutrient transport and cell division; and anti-virulence/anti-adaptation targets, including secretion systems, quorum sensing, biofilms, motility, adhesion, cell-wall-degrading enzymes, tolerance systems, oxidative-stress responses and host susceptibility factors. Using “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” (CLas) as a case study, genome annotation and infection-stage transcript-abundance data prioritized Sec-dependent secretion, outer-membrane/surface proteins, Bam assembly, nutrient transporters, Clp proteostasis, redox adaptation and core cellular processes as candidate target classes. Envelope-associated, secretion/anti-virulence, nutrient-acquisition and stress-sensitization modules may represent potential directions for downstream validation, but CLas candidates remain hypothesis-generating priorities requiring validation for essentiality, conservation, druggability, delivery feasibility, crop safety and field performance.
Zeng et al. (Sun,) studied this question.