Evaluates diagnostic capabilities of multimodal large language models in ophthalmology, suggesting potential for clinical use.
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly demonstrating substantial potential in the medical domain, particularly in image-intensive specialties such as ophthalmology. Although cutting-edge models like ChatGPT-4o and Qwen-VL 2.5 have shown strong performance on general-domain tasks, real-world clinical benchmarks for rigorously assessing their diagnostic capabilities in specialized medical contexts remain limited. To address this gap, we constructed a carefully curated benchmark dataset comprising 295 pathologically confirmed ophthalmic cases with representative clinical presentations. Using this dataset, we systematically evaluated nine leading MLLMs, including both open-source and proprietary models. The results showed that models such as HAIBU-ReMUD and ChatGPT-4o achieved comparatively strong diagnostic accuracy and consistency, with performance in some settings approaching that of human experts. These findings suggest that current MLLMs are showing encouraging feasibility for real-world clinical applications and provide a basis for further investigation of their integration into ophthalmology practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: