Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates AI design strategies to improve user alignment in online decision-making, suggesting enhanced collaboration.
Human-AI collaboration has demonstrated unique potential in various decision-making scenarios. However, the dynamic and personalized nature of online decision-making (e.g., shopping, trip planning) poses challenges to achieving alignment between AI support and user requirements. To address these challenges, we took online shopping as a representative scenario and conducted experience prototyping to explore human-AI collaboration in decision-making tasks. It revealed a dynamic transition in user requirements from ambiguity to clarity, while limited transparency and decision control hindered communication efficiency. Building on this, we formulated a design strategy comprising 10 AI actions that dynamically contribute to the human-AI interaction loop, aiming to achieve alignment between AI support and user requirements. We implemented this strategy in ContrXAI, an LLM-powered mixed-initiative system, and evaluated it as a technology probe. Findings demonstrated that ContrXAI effectively instantiated the design strategy, enhancing human-AI alignment and enriching the collaborative decision-making experience. We also identified typical user interaction patterns with ContrXAI and highlighted their expectations for AI collaborators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: