Investigates how proximity affects well-being through income comparisons, indicating varying impacts based on distance.
The present study investigates the role of proximity in shaping social income staticand dynamic comparisons and their impact on well-being, measured in terms ofself-assessed health. Using the Spanish Survey of Household Finances (2002-2017),the study examines how individuals compare their income trajectories with thoseof their peers, considering varying degrees of proximity. The findings reveal thatwell-being is negatively impacted by static comparisons only in the case of a significantincome gap with richer individuals. However, when dynamic comparisons areintroduced, individuals experience an improvement in their subjective well-beingwhen comparing to individuals who previously earned more but now earn less, aslong as they drop at a certain distance. Consequently, no effect is observed whencomparing with individuals in closer proximity, and effects emerge when the degreeof proximity is low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fonseca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: