Examines gender budgeting effects on sectoral allocations in OECD countries, suggesting legal mandates enhance equity outcomes.
Gender budgeting is widely promoted as a tool for advancing gender equity, yet evidence remains mixed. This study examines a key precursor to broader equity outcomes: whether gender budgeting shifts budget allocations across sectors. Results from OECD panel data and a staggered difference‐in‐differences design suggest that simple adoption without legal mandates has little effect on cross‐sectoral allocations. In contrast, legally mandated gender budgeting is associated with a higher share of “feminine” spending and a lower share of “masculine” spending. These findings help reconcile previously inconsistent results and respond to calls for more comparative evidence on the effects of gender budgeting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: