Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates optimization of MES-level parameters in cloud-based manufacturing, indicating significant reductions in violations.
In cloud manufacturing, Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) must dynamically optimize MES-level process parameters under multi-objective and constraint-intensive conditions, including quality conformity, production-takt feasibility, energy consumption, and equipment-stability risk. Conventional rule-based approaches suffer from limited efficiency, weak handling of parameter coupling, and insufficient decision traceability. This paper presents an AI-enabled Axiomatic Design (AD) governance framework for MES-level process parameter optimization and recommendation in cloud-based MES. AI capabilities are embedded within a structured AD-based framework to decompose manufacturing requirements, estimate functional requirement-design parameter coupling, and organize constraint-first decision making. A manufacturing knowledge graph encodes equipment boundaries and process rules as computable hard constraints; a multi-agent system (MAS) separates candidate generation, evaluation, and constraint validation; and a large language model (LLM) provides an evidence-driven semantic interface. Experiments were conducted on a 10,000-sample public manufacturing-process dataset. The rule audit confirmed that the dataset-defined Historical Favorable State label follows explicit thresholds on temperature, machine speed, and vibration; the classifier output is therefore used as label-consistency evidence within the evaluation module. In the offline recommendation case, the proposed AD-governed feasible-domain ranking achieved 0/20 hard-constraint violations in the Top-20 candidates, whereas the ungated weighted energy-stability ranking and the historical-label/data-driven ranking each produced 17/20 violations under the same deterministic tie-break rule. These results support the internal consistency and engineering feasibility of the proposed governance-oriented workflow at the MES execution-parameter level, with online industrial deployment identified as future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: