Observational study evaluates the performance of long peripheral catheters in short-term vascular access, suggesting clinical implications for selected patients.
Background: Long peripheral catheters are increasingly used as an alternative to short peripheral catheters for short-term intravenous therapy, particularly in patients with difficult intravenous access. However, evidence on their short-term functional performance and the impact of insertion techniques remains limited. Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients who received 4 Fr, 11 cm catheters inserted in the mid-upper arm at a tertiary academic hospital between January and August 2024. Clinical and procedural data were collected from routine records. Outcomes at 7 days included catheter function, ultrasound findings and complications. Associations between insertion technique, tip location and outcomes were explored using Spearman’s correlation analysis. Results: A total of 106 patients were included (mean age 77 ± 12 years), of whom 55 (51.9%) had catheter s in place at day 7. Dysfunction in withdrawal was common (54.5%), whereas infusion dysfunction was infrequent (5.4%). Ultrasound findings included non-compressible veins (23.6%) and hyperechoic material at the catheter tip (40%). The pseudo-tunnel technique was adopted in 40% of insertions. No significant associations were found between procedural variables and clinical outcomes (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: Long peripheral catheters represent a useful option for short-term vascular access in patients with difficult venous access. However, their limited reliability for blood withdrawal and the frequency of functional alterations after 7 days highlight the importance of careful device selection and close clinical monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: