Retrospective cross-sectional study evaluates white matter abnormalities in RR-MS, indicating potential imaging insights.
Background/Objectives: Normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) may contain abnormalities not visible on conventional MRI. This study evaluated whether intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) detects regional NAWM abnormalities and differentiates non-lesional white matter from lesion tissue in RR-MS. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional single-center study included 189 patients with RR-MS and 26 healthy controls. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were measured in the genu, splenium, frontal white matter, and posterior white matter. Regional MS NAWM was compared with the anatomically corresponding control white matter. Tissue-compartment analysis compared averaged control white matter, averaged MS NAWM, and lesion-averaged MS tissue. Results: Posterior white matter showed the strongest abnormalities, with lower ADC, D, D*, and f in RR-MS than in controls (all p < 0.001); ADC, D, and D* showed large effects (Cohen’s d: −0.81 to −1.07). In the splenium, ADC and D were higher, whereas D* was lower in RR-MS. After age and sex adjustment, posterior white matter ADC, D, and D* and splenial D* remained significant, whereas posterior f and splenial ADC/D were attenuated. No clear IVIM-DWI abnormality was detected in the sampled frontal white matter. Lesion-averaged MS tissue showed higher ADC, D, and D* than averaged MS NAWM and control white matter (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: Regional IVIM-DWI identified region-specific NAWM abnormalities in RR-MS, most robustly in posterior white matter, within an exploratory imaging framework. Larger matched longitudinal cohorts are required before clinical or prognostic utility can be established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alomair et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: