Evaluates proton donors' impact on enhancing interfacial water and OER performance, suggesting significant improvements in catalyst stability.
The activity‐stability dilemma in acidic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) stems from a fundamental trade‐off in the interface hydrogen‐bond network: while promoting interfacial water enrichment, it often impedes efficient proton transfer. Achieving simultaneous enhancement of interfacial water accumulation and deprotonation kinetics remains a critical challenge. Herein, we design a tungsten‐stabilized ruthenium oxide heterostructure (RuWO x ‐300) that overcomes this limitation in acidic OER. The high‐valence W 6+ species induce a localized electrostatic field, which enhances interfacial water enrichment. Concurrently, the W‐O bri ‐Ru moieties serve as active Brønsted acid sites with high proton‐donor capability, accelerating surface deprotonation. As a result, RuWO x ‐300 exhibits exceptional OER performance, requiring overpotentials of only 179 and 231 mV to achieve 10 and 100 mA cm −2 , respectively, and demonstrating remarkable stability for over 4820 h at 50 mA cm −2 , surpassing commercial RuO 2 and most reported Ru‐based catalysts. Through ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations and in situ Raman spectroscopy, we elucidate a dual‐functional mechanism: increased interfacial water coverage reduces the activation barrier for O─O bond formation, while proton‐donor‐enhanced transfer kinetics suppresses Ru dissolution. This work establishes a new design principle for highly active and stable acidic OER electrocatalysts via proton‐donor‐mediated interfacial water activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: