Randomized trial demonstrates robust watermark recovery in 3D medical images, suggesting effective patient data protection for telemedicine.
This paper proposes a volumetric blind watermarking framework for 3D medical images based on adaptive DWT–SVD embedding with multi-slice fusion. The method dynamically adjusts embedding strength per slice using two complementary criteria: entropy (to exploit perceptual masking in textured regions) and anatomical position (to prioritize centrally located slices that are less likely to be cropped). A content-dependent chaotic encryption, initialized from the SHA-256 hash of the entire volume, secures the watermark before embedding into the low-frequency DWT subbands via singular value modification. During extraction, a multi-slice fusion mechanism aggregates watermark estimates from all slices using positional weights, ensuring robust recovery even under localized attacks. Experiments on 20 brain MRI and 15 chest CT volumes ([Formula: see text] up to 160 slices) demonstrate high imperceptibility (average PSNR [Formula: see text] 44.8[Formula: see text]dB for MRI, 43.6[Formula: see text]dB for CT; SSIM [Formula: see text]) and strong robustness (average BER [Formula: see text] 0.044 across 15 distinct attack types including JPEG compression, Gaussian noise, median filtering, rotation, scaling, cropping, and slice drop-out). Compared to nine state-of-the-art methods, including transform-based, feature-based, and deep learning approaches, the proposed framework achieves the lowest average BER (0.044 versus 0.063 for the closest competitor MCANet) while maintaining competitive imperceptibility and requiring only CPU-based computation ([Formula: see text] seconds per volume). These results position the proposed method as a practical, secure, and clinically viable solution for protecting patient data in telemedicine and PACS environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikram et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: