Evaluates temperature and moisture effect on nematode survival and virulence, suggesting tailored storage techniques.
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are among the most promising biocontrol agents; however, their short shelf life constrains commercial application. This study evaluated the effects of storage temperature (6 °C and 25 °C) and sponge substrate moisture content (42%, 48%, and 55%) on the 18-week survival and post-storage virulence of two indigenous EPN species from Gansu Province, China: Heterorhabditis megidis 0627M and Steinernema feltiae 0619HT. A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) revealed that storage duration, temperature, moisture content, and species all significantly affected survival of H. megidis 0627M and S. feltiae 0619HT (all p < 0.001). Low-temperature storage (6 °C) reduced mortality odds by 82.4% compared with room temperature (OR = 0.176, 95% CI: 0.117–0.263, p < 0.001). High moisture content (55%) increased mortality odds by 10.1-fold relative to moderate moisture (48%; OR = 10.114, 95% CI: 6.155–16.618, p < 0.001), whereas low moisture (42%) showed no significant difference from 48% (OR = 0.942, p = 0.810). The two species exhibited distinct adaptation strategies: S. feltiae 0619HT achieved the highest survival under low-temperature storage at 48% moisture content (56.48% at week 18), whereas H. megidis 0627M demonstrated a delayed competitive advantage under room-temperature, low-moisture conditions. Virulence assays revealed that low-temperature storage better preserved infectivity under most conditions. Notably, survival and virulence were not always concordant, necessitating their evaluation as complementary metrics. Species-specific storage protocols are proposed, providing a scientific basis for the future development of regionally targeted and cost-effective native EPN formulations, as well as for regionally targeted biocontrol applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: