Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows improved segmentation performance in medical images, suggesting enhanced clinical utility.
Medical image segmentation requires balancing accuracy, computational efficiency, and uncertainty quantification for potential clinical deployment. Transformer-based architectures achieve superior performance through global context modeling but demand prohibitive computational resources (>20 GFLOPs), while lightweight convolutional networks sacrifice accuracy due to limited receptive fields. We propose an uncertainty-aware efficient segmentation framework synergizing Mamba state-space models with evidential deep learning. Our method employs a 2D-adapted selective state-space mechanism (cross-scan over four directions) to capture long-range dependencies with linear complexity O ( L ), overcoming transformers’ quadratic scaling. The uncertainty-guided attention module (UGAM) leverages Dirichlet-parameterized evidential learning to decompose epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty, adaptively recalibrating features through spatial-channel attention conditioned on prediction confidence. Progressive multi-scale fusion with gradient-based uncertainty supervision enhances boundary delineation and calibration. Experiments on five 2D benchmarks show competitive performance: 82.67% mean Dice on Synapse (1.46% improvement over Swin-UNet, and competitive with state-space peers U-Mamba and Swin-UMamba retrained under the same 2D protocol) with only 7.8M parameters and 4.7 GFLOPs–representing \(3.5×\) parameter reduction and \(4.8×\) efficiency gain. Real-time inference at 37.2 FPS with well-calibrated uncertainty (Expected Calibration Error: 0.046) supports further evaluation of its potential value for time-sensitive clinical workflow analysis rather than direct clinical deployment. A small, single-center reader study using 150 ACDC cases and three radiologists suggested that uncertainty visualization may be associated with improved reader confidence (22.2%) and reduced decision time (18.6%); these exploratory findings require prospective, multi-reader, multi-scanner validation. We explicitly do not claim generalization to 3D volumes, high-resolution pathology, multi-phase CT/MRI, or severe class-imbalance regimes, which are left to future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: