Key result
Novel PCSK9 inhibitors outperform SBC-115,337, blocking PCSK9-LDLR binding with up to ~65% greater potency.
Why the study?
Do novel PCSK9-LDLR protein-protein interaction inhibitors disrupt PCSK9-LDLR interaction and increase LDL uptake in vitro?
Do novel PCSK9-LDLR protein-protein interaction inhibitors disrupt PCSK9-LDLR interaction and increase LDL uptake in vitro?
Novel small molecule inhibitors of PCSK9-LDLR interaction (especially B27) demonstrate in vitro efficacy in restoring LDLR expression and increasing LDL uptake, providing lead compounds for hyperlipidemia treatment.
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) mediating the degradation of the hepatic low‐density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), has emerged as a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Herein, to disrupt the protein‐protein interactions (PPIs) between PCSK9 and LDLR, a total of 43 compounds were designed and synthesized by structural modification of previous derived PCSK9 inhibitors. In the PCSK9‐LDLR PPI interfering test, compounds B7 , B23 , and B27 showed inhibitory potency with IC 50 values of 8.86 μM, 3.95 μM, and 5.02 μM, respectively, compared with the positive control SBC‐115,337 (IC 50 value of 11.36 μM). Molecular docking predicted binding mode of compound B27 on the PCSK9‐LDLR interaction interface, and hydrophobic interactions play an important role in the binding of B27 to PCSK9. Moreover, compounds B7 , B23 , and especially B27 restored the expression of LDLR and increased LDL uptake of HepG2 cell in the presence of PCSK9. Collectively, lead compounds with lipid‐lowering potential were developed for further design of PCSK9‐LDLR PPI inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied Hyperlipidemia. Novel PCSK9-LDLR PPI inhibitors (compounds B7, B23, B27) vs. SBC-115,337 was evaluated on PCSK9-LDLR PPI inhibitory potency (IC50). Novel compounds B7, B23, and B27 inhibited PCSK9-LDLR protein-protein interactions with IC50 values of 8.86 μM, 3.95 μM, and 5.02 μM, respectively, compared to 11.36 μM for the control SBC-115,337.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: