Examines innovation performance in foreign-owned firms, indicating policy implications.
The innovative behaviour of foreign-owned firms has mainly been studied with a focus on the micro-level determinants being less the attention paid to the relevance of capability-building processes in host-countries. Drawing on the national innovation system (NIS) perspective in developing countries, this paper examines the mutually reinforcing relationship between NIS performance – particularly its techno-economic (TE) and socio-political (SP) spheres – and the innovation behaviour of foreign-owned firms, using microdata from eight Latin American innovation surveys covering the period 2010–2016, complemented by country-level indicators. The results indicate that foreign-owned firms are more likely to exhibit higher innovation performance in NIS with a robust interplay between TE capabilities and SP stability, thus providing insights for potential co-evolutionary dynamics between firm-level innovation behaviour and the broader national innovation environment. At a more disaggregated level, the findings reveal that both the socio-political conditions and the science, technology and innovation (STI) framework play a critical role in fostering innovation performance as NIS capabilities evolve. The implication is that institutional environments act as conditional factors for the innovation strategies and performance of foreign-owned firms, offering new insights for the design of policies that take into account the different NIS dimensions affecting this process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: