Evaluates structural safety in scaffolding through an automated vision-based framework, indicating enhanced safety management.
The assembly quality of scaffolding systems directly governs the safety of personnel on construction sites. According to construction safety statistics, scaffolding-related accidents account for approximately 30–40% of construction fatalities globally, with geometric assembly deviations being a contributing factor in over 60% of scaffold collapse incidents. Traditional scaffolding inspections rely heavily on manual measurements, which are inherently inefficient, hazardous, and difficult to scale comprehensively. This study presents an automated evaluation framework that integrates computer vision with structural mechanics simulations. First, an object detection model based on the SegFormer encoder architecture is developed to precisely identify scaffolding standards, ledgers, and couplers against complex site backgrounds. Its hierarchical Transformer encoder and global self-attention mechanism enable the model to capture long-range topological relationships, achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP@0.5) of 95.2% on a custom dataset with an inference speed of 45 FPS per 640 × 640 image patch. For complete high-resolution frame processing including tiling and geometric extraction, the end-to-end pipeline requires approximately 8–12 s per frame. Second, a simplified Hough transform with a restricted parameter domain is introduced. Integrated with a dual-track image processing workflow, this algorithm performs sub-pixel centerline fitting to automatically extract critical geometric parameters, including lift height and bay width, maintaining a relative measurement error within 3.5% compared to manual ground truth. Finally, a parameterized finite element model is established. An automated mapping middleware dynamically injects the extracted as-built parameters into the simulation environment. Comparative simulation analysis indicates that a 14.7% deviation in standard lift height, coupled with an initial tilt defect of 1/150, precipitates a 22.4% reduction in the predicted structural stability factor, illustrating the framework’s capability for assessing relative capacity degradation between design intent and as-built conditions. This framework establishes a robust, closed-loop pipeline spanning visual perception and structural safety assessment, indicating potential for automated construction site safety management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: