Cross-sectional survey examines feeding guidelines for infants with CHD on non-invasive ventilation, indicating a need for improved practices.
BACKGROUND: Infants with CHD experience feeding disruptions during a critical phase in oral feeding development. Dependency on high respiratory supports interfere with oral feeding opportunities. There is little evidence guiding oral feeding practices for infants requiring high flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure. The aim of this study was to describe current US institutional feeding practices for infants with CHD on non-invasive ventilation. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of clinicians from primarily US institutions that were members of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Collaborative. RESULTS: From 35 institutions contacted, 20 (57%) feeding specialists responded. Most institutions (80%) did not utilise formal guidelines for oral feeding introduction on nasal continuous positive airway pressure or high flow nasal cannula. Most institutions (80%) did not allow full oral feeds on nasal continuous positive airway pressure, but 70% centres allowed full oral nutrition on high flow nasal cannula and (85%) allowed small volume oral feeding with specifications for the level of oxygen support. While most respondents (65%) reported feeding assessment completion on all infants both pre and postoperatively, few (30%) institutions utilised a formal cue-based assessment. CONCLUSION: Responses indicate that institutions generally do not allow oral feeding on respiratory support above high flow nasal cannula. Most centres do not utilise formal respiratory/cue based assessments to determine infant feeding readiness while on non-invasive ventilation. Future multidisciplinary research and quality improvement initiatives are needed to examine the effects of feeding infants with CHD while on non-invasive ventilation and to develop centre-specific guidelines to direct feeding progression, with potential to improve oral feeding outcomes while supporting multisystem stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: